Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evan Hoyt vs Marco Miceli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoyt vs Miceli analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Hoyt vs Marco Miceli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoyt 1 - 0 Miceli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoyt has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Miceli has won 38.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoyt, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Miceli has won 47.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoyt has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miceli has saved 43.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoyt has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Miceli winning 39.29% (W/L 11/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoyt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 124/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Miceli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 42/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoyt winning 1 times and Miceli being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hoyt winning 2 and Miceli winning 1. The last match between Hoyt and Miceli was at the Tunisia F42 (Monastir), 29-11-2018, Second, Hard with Evan Hoyt getting the victory 4-6 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoyt and Miceli have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hoyt winning 1 times and Miceli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoyt winning 0, and Miceli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoyt has played against opponents with an average rank of while Miceli has played against players with an average rank of 175.21.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoyt has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miceli has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoyt has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miceli has converted 47.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
319
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
580
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
60% (188-127)
Career Total W/L
49% (182-186)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (5-10)
$775
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Evan Hoyt vs Marco Miceli For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hoyt VS Miceli
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Evan Hoyt | Marco Miceli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:0 | 2:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (41/73) | 71% (57/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (29/41) | 46% (26/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (15/32) | 52% (12/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (42/80) | 40% (29/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Evan Hoyt
Player
Marco Miceli
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evan Hoyt | Marco Miceli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (5/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 37% (13/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (146/180) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (5/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:27:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 144.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 69% (577/833) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (317/577) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (98/256) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (44/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (355/823) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (5/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (5/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Evan Hoyt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Evan Hoyt
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Miguel Gomes
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Evan Hoyt
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Evan Hoyt
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Evan Hoyt
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
65%
(
33 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Evan Hoyt
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Emiliano Maggioli
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Evan Hoyt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
11
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Evan Hoyt
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Mark Whitehouse
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Marco Miceli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Marco Miceli
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefano Baldoni
Player
Marco Miceli
88%
(
43 of
49)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Miceli
Player
Federico Guarducci
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuvan Nandal
Player
Marco Miceli
56%
(
69 of
124)
1st Serve %
79%
(
84 of
106)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
62 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
117
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Marco Miceli
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Marco Miceli
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Marco Miceli
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marco Miceli
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Miceli
Player
Radovan Michalik
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Miceli
Player
Farzan Amiri
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hoyt Vs Miceli Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hoyt are available here and Miceli photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
